Derive your industry's boring AI use cases
The 12 boring use cases in the vertical chapters aren't arbitrary lists — they come from a consistent framework: high volume, structured task, measurable output, low judgment requirement at the execution layer, and a human-in-the-loop gate that protects the step requiring real expertise. Run this derivation for any industry.
Step 1 — List your 6 to 8 highest-cost workflows
Start with the workflows that consume the most staff time, generate the most errors, or create the most client friction. Don't filter yet.
| # | Workflow name | Est. staff hours/week | Error or complaint rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 |
Step 2 — Separate judgment steps from non-judgment steps
For each workflow above, list its main steps. Mark each step as J (requires professional judgment, regulatory compliance, or client relationship) or NJ (lookup, comparison, drafting, formatting, extraction, classification, or routing). AI candidates are the NJ steps.
| Workflow (#) | Step description | J or NJ? | AI candidate? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N | |||
| Y / N |
Step 3 — Apply the 5 diagnostic questions
For each NJ step you marked above, answer the five questions. Steps that score yes on 3 or more are strong candidates.
- Looking things up, comparing, or sorting? If someone on your team spends significant time searching through documentation, comparing options against criteria, or sorting items into categories — that is a Pattern 2 candidate.
- What do your clients say they want faster? Speed is a leading indicator for a cycle-time compression opportunity. "We need the proposal faster." "Why does onboarding take three weeks?" Go find the workflow behind the delay.
- Is output quality inconsistently variable? Consistency problems are almost always high-volume, structured-task problems. Humans can't maintain consistent attention across high-volume structured work indefinitely. AI can.
- Is the human doing work that isn't judgment? Document assembly, data extraction, format standardization, first-draft generation against a template — those are non-judgment steps. Your expensive people should be spending their time on the judgment steps only.
- What's the first artifact a new client or customer touches — and how was it produced? Client-facing artifacts almost always have significant non-judgment work embedded in their production. Improving them is immediately visible to the client.
Step 4 — Rank and select
Take your AI candidates from Step 2. Rank them by volume (highest first), then by unit cost of human execution (highest first). The top 3 to 5 are your boring use cases. Circle the one at the top for your first pilot.
| AI candidate (NJ step) | Volume rank (1=highest) | Unit cost rank (1=highest) | Combined rank | Pilot this quarter? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y / N | ||||
| Y / N | ||||
| Y / N | ||||
| Y / N | ||||
| Y / N |
What you will almost certainly find
- ☐ A document that gets read and summarized repeatedly
- ☐ An intake or triage process where incoming requests need to be classified and routed
- ☐ A reporting cycle where data needs to be assembled, formatted, and distributed
- ☐ A quality or compliance check that happens the same way on every unit of work
- ☐ A first-draft-generation step in a deliverable that follows a consistent structure
Those are your boring use cases. The specifics differ by industry. The structure doesn't.
My #1 candidate
Use case: ______
Workflow it lives in: ______
Volume per week: ______
What "done right" looks like in numbers: ______
HITL gate: ______
Want a second set of eyes on this in your firm? The no-sell promise applies — if it isn't a fit, I'll tell you in the first ten minutes.
Book a 30-Minute Call →